如何练出合理的雅思写作思维
对于雅思写作来说，思维逻辑是中国考生和西方考生不一样的地方,那么如何练出合理的雅思写作思维??下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
如何练出合理的雅思写作思维
常见的雅思写作思路
你可能想到的是，“不同意(少了一些语言，生活不会变容易些)”，因为少了一些语言，“部分民族文化就会消失”。这个点是存在问题的，因为没有答题。“少了一些语言，部分民族文化就会消失”，和“生活不会变容易”有什么联系呢?感觉是2个无关的句子。
这个答案会导致什么样的问题呢?评分标准Task Response没有达到。有什么办法补救呢?(想想民族文化的部分消失和生活不会变简单有什么联系)
可以考虑的答案是：少了文化特色，旅游就少了，旅游带来的经济增长就少了，钱少了自然生活就变难了。
那这是一个好的答案吗?梳理一下以上的推理，就可以推出来：
语言的消失-民族文化的部分消失-旅游较少了-旅游带来的经济增长就减少了-钱少了生活就困难了。
推理越长，就可以凑到越多的字数?
请尽早摒弃这样的想法。
我们来这样思考一下：
①某种语言的消失，能导致这个民族的文化有多大部分消失?②这部分民族文化的消失，能导致旅游减少多少?(只有一点点)③旅游减少了，对当地经济的影响有多大?只要不是旅游国家或者旅游城市，影响就很小。那又有多少个主要靠旅游发展的国家和城市呢?所占比例非常小!
上面那些影响的大小是怎么估算出来的?通过日常的知识积累(平时一定要多接收信息，多思考)。一个推出另一个，但是推出可能性都不是100%，那么第一个推到最后一个，可能性是多大呢?可能性会随着中间层级的数量的增加而减小。其实每次往前推，可能性都会变小，所以不要把推理做“长”了。
综上，这是一个不好的雅思写作论证。
其实我们在答题的时候，一般会想到很多相关的信息，而不是一开始就想到最可靠的信息。然后，我们应该去斟酌并筛选出强的论证，(丢掉弱的论证)。
回到题目，有什么更好的答案呢?
考虑如下论证：
1. 每种语言有自己的发音特点，和当地人的生理特征相称。换句话说，当部分语言消失时，部分人就要学习和自己生理结构不相称的语言，生活变难(比如，硬要日本人说英语)。
2. 一门独立的语言，包含很多表达当地人特点(感情，性格，思考方式等)的词和表达方式(想想那些只有当地人听得懂的字眼);统一化的语言常常没有这么精细。这样，当部分语言消失时，人们想表达的某些感情和个性就无法表达了，生活变难。
在雅思写作中，高大上的分论点是得分的关键吗?还是普通的观点配上优秀的语言?
这就是典型的语言重于思维。
如果我汉语不好，就无法表达我以上的意思，你会顺着看到这里吗?或者，我不能够有效地表达自己的意思，能让你学会这些东西吗?语言的重要性是极高的。
如果只靠语言，那么你就不必刷题了，因为你去背一篇语言完美的文章，考试的时候直接默写下来就可以了。这显然是不行的，再好的模板(好的句式)，你再好地去运用，没有合理的思维，雅思写作就是5.5分及以下。
两条腿走路，思维和语言都很重要!
那么，如何能练出合理的雅思写作思维?
扩大你的知识量
多看《网易公开课》，尤其是里面的《TED》。《语言如何改变人类》(“27个盟国，说着23种语言，你需要253人的翻译队伍”)如果你看过上面这个视频，回答这个题目就会容易很多。
刷题
一起来看到这样三个分论点：
1. 跨文化交流变得容易 2. 获得资讯变得容易 3. 学习变得容易
其实这是有方法的。不过是把life分成了以上3个方面而已，这叫做分类法。多刷题，就会找到解题的各种套路!
雅思考试写作范文：广告的优缺点
Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with?
Model Answer 1:
I think that everyone can divide all advertising products and services into useless ones and useful ones. It is like looking through an information desk when you pay attention to those messages that interest you. Take me for example.
I do not like jewelry. It does not mean I do not have it at all, I have a couple of inexpensive rings as gifts from my parents. I just think, people pay too much attention to this stuff. I believe it is the result of mass advertising. Every day when I am watching TV, listening to the radio or reading the paper I notice many ads about getting an expensive ring, chain, necklace or ear-rings. From my point of view these kinds of advertising contaminate people's minds. In this case you are encouraged to buy things you do not really need. They make you believe you need such products in order to succeed or be happy.
From the other side, I think that advertisements of the new detergents with up-to-date formulas to help you maintain your cloth in perfect conditions, the new cars with some extra futures that make your traveling more comfortable and sports goods that make your life healthier may help you to improve your life.
Recently my husband and I saw an ad on the Internet about a very interesting and inexpensive vocation to Japan for a week. Is not it awesome? We like traveling. So now we are planning to find out more about it and, may be, make reservations. I believe that without advertisements we would be unaware about plenty of oppotunities that may make your life happier, easier and less stressful.
My point is that every person has his own scale of values. So if he is vegetarian he will consider an ad about meat products useless for him.
Model Answer 2:
The purpose of advertising is to tell the consumer about any new product or service or any new promotion on the existing product and service. We need it so we can make good decisions when we go shopping. Advertising tells us when new and improved products become available and lets us know which ones have the best price.
Through advertising we learn about new products. For example, many grocery stores now sell prepackaged lunches. These are very convenient for busy parents. They can give these lunches to their children to take to school. Busy parents don’t have time to look at every item on the store shelf, so without advertising they might not know about such a convenient new product.
Even products we are familiar with may be improved, and advertising lets us know about this. Most people use cell phones, but new types of cell phone service become available all the time. There are different plans that give you more hours to talk on the phone, you can send text messages and photos, and next week probably some even newer type of service will be available. By watching advertisements on TV it is easy to find out about new improvements to all kinds of products.
Advertisements keep us informed about prices. Prices change all the time, but everyone can look at the ads in the newspaper and see what the latest prices are. Advertisements also inform us about sales. In fact, some people buy the newspaper only in order to check the prices and plan their weekly shopping.
Advertisements improve our lives by keeping us informed about the latest products developments and the best prices. Advertisements serve a useful purpose.
雅思考试写作范文：医疗保险自费还是公费
The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.
Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to have a comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.
Model Answer:
A much debated issue these days is whether citizens should take out private health insurance or not. The cost of providing free medical care for both the wealthy and the poor is far too great for any government, and most people agree that if you can pay for insurance, you should. In this essay, I will argue that all who can afford it should be insured, but free medical care must be made available for those too poor to do so.
The most important reason for encouraging people to take out private health insurance is the cost to the government of health care. Free health cover for people who are able to pay for it is a waste of public money. Of course, people will only pay health insurance premiums if they know that they are getting good value for their money. If they get sick, they should pay very little or nothing at all. In addition, the privately insured are entitled to special benefits such as having the choice of their own doctors, and being able to avoid long waiting lists for hospital beds.
On the other hand, those who really cannot afford to pay private insurance premiums, which are often very high, are still entitled as citizens to the best medical care available – they cannot be expected to pay their own medical bills. However, if they are working, they should still pay a percentage of their wage (say 1 to 2%) as a tax which pays towards the cost of providing "free" medical services.
In conclusion, most people should privately insure their health, but it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. Therefore, a safety net in the form of a basic free health care system must exist for the very poor and the unemployed.
雅思考试写作范文：免费教育
All education, primary, secondary and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Model Answer:
Different countries have different education systems. I don‛t know all the education systems in the world but all the ones I do know about have free school education at primary and secondary level. I certainly agree with the statement that this should be the case. I believe university education is different.
No matter what standard of income someone has or what society someone comes from, everyone should have the opportunity to have a good standard of education. This is not always what happens but it is what should happen. Private schools can be available for those who want and can afford it but the free schools should always be there. This is certainly one of the best attributes of western democracy and all countries it seems strive to attain situation although some have problems due to the economic and political situations in their countries. Governments should make sure that all their citizens have access to a good standard of free education at primary and secondary level.
Further education is different. In an ideal world this should be free but governments have a lot of demands on their money. I think that students should have to pay, maybe not all, but at least a contribution towards their tuition fees. They will be able to earn it back once they have graduated. The UK has this system whereas in the US students have to pay all their high tuition fees which can run into the tens of thousands of dollars over a full course. I am not sure if I agree with this but it certainly would make sure that students make the best of efforts to pass or all their money would be wasted.
Therefore I conclude that primary and secondary education should be freely available for all if possible but that further education should not necessarily be wholly free.
如何练出合理的雅思写作思维相关文章：
