GRE写作精选句式汇总分享
GRE写作中对句式的运用是很重要的一条评分标准,文章能否写得出彩,许多时候就取决于大家能否写出多样化的句式。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作精选句式汇总分享,来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作精选句式汇总分享
GRE写作黄金经典句型——EDUCATION 教育篇
GRE写作黄金经典句型1
And gladly would learn , and gladly teach .( Chaucer , British poet)
勤于学习的人才能乐意施教。(英国诗人,乔叟)
GRE写作黄金经典句型2
Better be unborn than untaught , for ignorance is the root of misfortune 。(Plato , Ancient Greek philosopher)
与其不受教育,不如不生,因为无知是不幸的根源。(古希腊哲学家 柏拉图)
GRE写作黄金经典句型3
Genius17 without education is like silver in the mine. (Benjamin Franklin , American president )
未受教育的天才,犹如矿中之银。 (美国总统 富兰克。 B.)
GRE写作黄金经典句型4
The roots of education are bitter , but the fruit is sweet .(Aristotle , Ancient Greek philosopher )
教育的根是苦的,但其果实是甜的。(古希腊哲学家 亚里士多德)
GRE写作高分范文:information
GRE写作题目:
Much of the information that people assume is factualactually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus,any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此,任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑,因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
GRE写作范文:
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so,I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things,however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with,the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno,the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for,while just a minor particle in it. Equally,no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity,the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one,and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However,what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that,due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability,they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time,our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits,the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases,and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism,no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr,because their theories are based on distinct views,the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts,these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament,the conclusions we make might well be justifiable,if not completely right,to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application,instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body,they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients,of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up,while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately,for the reason of the limitation of the abilities,I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves,as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis,I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable,we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE写作:从哪里开始写
第一是列举他因,就是提出其他可能性,举不出正例举反例,举不出反例举特例,比如说调查发现A地方的人想要增加骑单车的时间,所以应该在AB只见建立单车道。这种简单的逻辑关系gre里面比比皆是,最好就开始举其他可能性,比如,AB之间可能很远,骑单车五个小时,人还没到就累死了。或者,A人愿意骑车,说不定B人嫉车如仇,那么修这条车道只造福A,效益性达不到了。
再或者,A本来基本不骑车,想要增加骑车时间,也就是每周稍微一骑,去一趟周围公园或者超市,没有想一路蹬另一个城市的欲望……Without ruling out all these possibilities by making more study on these relevant topics, the argument is not convincing enough to reach the conclusion.
另一种我常用的方法就是要求有更多论据支撑。比如批驳前面同一句话,我们就可以要求,调查AB两个地方之间的长度,调查B人民的意愿,调查A人民对骑车到B的意愿等等。这两个方法,列举他因适合用来批判因果关系,而要求更多论据适合批判所有提出的论据。比如说,应该在空地修一个篮球场,因为这个地方小孩子喜欢体育。
这时候就开始质疑这个论据不充分,因为我们要知道到底这地方有多少小孩子,其中喜欢体育的有多少喜欢篮球场,这片空地本来又造福了多少人,而这些人占有的比率和小孩子的比率相比,甚至扯远一点,这个地方未来孩子出生率如何,未来会不会面临孩子很少的情况等等。在这些论据不充足的情况下,仅仅这一条论据无法证明论点。
这两个方法的好处在于,可以发散思维,不怕没话可说。而且可以写得很长很丰满,还显得我们才思敏捷,批驳到位。最好的在于,基本每篇都有这种错。
还有一个常常用的到的,是质疑定义。这个往往在结尾会有漏洞。就举那个空地的例子。他们论证到最后说,因此,把空地建成篮球场,有利于全区的福利。这时候就可以质问,你怎么定义全区的福利?如果全区的福利仅仅是由喜欢运动的人代表的,他们的福利当然得到了保护。
但是如果全区的福利代表的是大部分人有福利呢。这片空地以前那么多人享受鸟语花香,现在没了,这批人的福利何在?诸如此类,不胜枚举。
其他还有好多,只能见缝插针了。这个也不是一朝一夕之功。
GRE写作精选句式汇总分享相关文章: