GRE写作备考日常训练要点方法介绍
考生开始备考GRE作文前，列出一个切实可行的学习计划是十分必要的。在了解自己的水平基础以后，再有针对性的进行作文备考，下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作备考日常训练3大要点方法介绍，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作备考日常训练3大要点方法介绍
新GRE写作日常练习要点：了解自我，找准方向，集中突破
每位GRE作文考友专业背景、准备时间与英语基础都不相同，在练习写作中面临的问题当然也不一样。有些人语言和思维都很出色，有些是比较有想法但表达能力不足，有些是英语基础好但思路比较狭窄。只要看看不同人发出的GRE作文批改文章，就能看出这些差别，用统一的教材和练习方法来进行准备，未必对每个人都意味着高效率。所以，第一步就是要了解自己的不足之处在哪里，对准自己的薄弱环节进行日常练习，务必在日常练习中时时注意，集中突破，只有了解自己最需要提高的是哪个方面，才能更有效提升水平。
新GRE写作日常练习要点：避免低效率重复劳动
不少新GRE写作的考友一上来干劲十足，每天一篇issue或者argument，但如果一位埋头猛练，却不解决基本问题而沉溺于题海战术中，往往是事倍功半。即使能找到老师帮你批改得很好，但你并没有透彻了解自己语法或者思维方式错误的根本原因在哪里。那就只能寄希望于把每一篇改过的都背下来然后在考试时碰上。实在是太过看运气的笨办法。先找到问题，然后有针对性地进行系统性学习，打好基础，感觉有提高了再来实践，再发现问题再提高。这才是比较良性有效率的日常练习循环方式。傻练千遍，不如精练一篇。
新GRE作文日常练习要点：重点准备GRE作文提纲，选择性地练习实战写作
之前提到的题海战术有两个问题：除了刚才说过的没有解决根本问题外，还会产生机会成本过高的问题。所谓机会成本，就是你花的时间过多，而这些时间本来可以用来做更有意义的事情，比如说记单词，学习语法或者看书开拓思路。设想你英文很差，但你写作很努力，在考试时又碰上了写过的题目，你的作文得了5分以上，但verbal只有300多分，人家一眼就能看出你的真实水平来。所以我觉得在打基础的同时，要把重点放在提纲也就是思路的准备上。
Argument也许用不着每个都准备提纲，但issue最好是能每一篇都仔细想一想大概怎么写。试想一下，如果你在考试时面对题目，最可能使你心慌的是什么?那可能就是这道题没见过，不知从哪下手;如果你想过，即使你没写过，你也不会太紧张，毕竟对于写作来说最重要的还是思路。有了思路，之后要怎么写都是水到渠成的事情。有时候虽然具体的题目好写，但要在如此短时间内组织得很漂亮，还是有难度的，如果中途稍有阻滞，情绪就会大受影响。所以，准备作文提供十分重要。
以上就是GRE作文日常练习计划的一些心得和体会，考生们可以在避免出现同样类型错误的同时，再继续加强新GRE作文复习的脚步。新GRE作文最重要的是培养一种逻辑思维，到了美国学习也同样需要这样的思维，所以现在掌握GRE写作逻辑思维更重要。祝大家都能在gre考试中取得好的成绩。
GRE写作高分范文：权威问题
Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
GRE写作范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of
cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
GRE写作高分范文：现代摄像机和印刷术
GRE写作题目：
“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”
摄像机可以通过如此精确而有力的记录手段来再现当代生活，因此它已经代替书面记录成为了一种更重要的记录手段。
GRE写作范文：
“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”There have been many methods of documenting in the history of human， from carved ancient pottery to sheepskin documents， of which the video camera may be the newest form with certain superiorities and inferiorities to written records. The advantages of video camera certainly make it an important form of documentation， but not to the extent of being more essential than written records due to its disadvantages.
To begin with， video can be interpreted as a series of pictures associated along the time， while written records can be considered as the descriptions of these pictures.Therefore， it is undoubtedly that video contains much more information than that of written records. From a video， we can clearly know what happened with subtle details.Merely with a television set， we can easily watch the happenings at home， such as the Olympic Games， comfortably sitting on the sofa， needless to be present on the spot.
And more excitedly， certain close-up enables us to scrutinize our favorable athletes. If there isn‘t video camera， we may be unable to enjoy such activities unless we can afford time and expense to be on the spot. While it is true that we can also be acquainted with the circumstances through newspaper or other media， however， the written record may be unable to present them as accurate as video. The imagination from the reports， however detailed， dooms to be imaginary， by all means different from the real circumstance， which video can represent. Moreover， the written records may contain some mistakes due to the carelessness or injustice of its reporters， while the video may be more accurate and convincing.
Another strongpoint of video is that it can be perceived simply by visual signals， from which people mainly get information in their daily lives， and therefore this method is more natural than written records. Everyone， ranging from a babbling child to an old grandpa， is able to get some information from the video just as they do during their daily lives， regardless of their literate ability. While the written record， no matter how easily it is represented， requires literacy of its readers， and a newspaper or book means nothing to an illiterate person. In addition， video is much easier to comprehend for people all over the world. For instance， an American can grasp nothing about a story written in Chinese unless s/he has learnt such a foreign language. However， s/he can absolutely understand something about a video recorded in China， although s/he may be confused with the language spoken in the video.
While video is certainly not superior to written recorders in all aspects， its limitations determine that the written record will not be replaced at least at present. The first disadvantage of video is that it is much more inconvenient and expensive. Video must be recorded on the spot， namely， when an event happens to you， you cannot record it unless you have a camera at hand. However， even though you haven’t paper and pencil either， you are still able to recall it to record based on your remembrance.
Therefore， for those who can’t afford a handy camera or who are unwilling to bring it anytime anywhere， the written records may be the easiest form available. Further， another weakness of video is that its cost is too high and its correspondingly high-quality record may be beyond people‘s requirement. The cost of making a written report is much less than that of manipulating a video. Also， every morning we may browse a newspaper to know what happened throughout the world， and the simple report， which may only consume us a few seconds， meets our needs of curiosity; we needn’t the accuracy and vividness of video， which may be more time-consuming.
